Showing posts with label art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art. Show all posts

19 Dec 2010

Glasgow Life or Death by Rebecca Gordon Nesbitt

An analysis of the privatisation of Glasgow City Council’s cultural and leisure services was met with legal threats when it was published a couple of years ago. 

For the past six months, Rebecca Gordon Nesbitt has been updating this research using as many of the investigative tools at my disposal as possible. A full report is now online  http://www.shiftyparadigms.org/images/Glasgow_Life_or_Death.pdf
 
Please download it before it is threatened with removal.

Against a backdrop of growing inequality in the city, Culture and Sport Glasgow (CSG), or Glasgow Life as the company now prefers to call itself, has:
  • failed to attract the outside funding on which its financial model was predicated, which means that vital services will have to be cut.
  • run up a staggering pension deficit during its time of operation.
  • trampled on the rights of its workers, which were supposed to be protected under the terms of its agreement with the council.
  • prioritised the attraction of tourists to the city over the needs of the people of Glasgow.
  • allowed its board members to profit from skewed procurement processes.
  • bypassed mechanisms in place to ensure transparency.
In the current climate of cuts to the public sector,  it is necessary to make these findings known to the broadest possible readership, so that this devolved model of service provision is thoroughly rejected as a future option.

Please disseminate this report to anyone you think might be interested.

5 Dec 2010

Neil Mulholland Presentation

           


Neil Mulholland delivered a talk which illuminated the paradoxes inherent in contemporary Scottish culture and politics, drawing on Michael Gardiner’s arguments in, From Trocchi to Trainspotting: Scottish Cultural Theory since 1960. Referring to the anxiety which has arisen in the wake of devolution Mulholland compared Scotland with Venice...fiercely independent... punching above its weight, but slowly sinking. He reminded us that there was a British culture and a Scottish culture, that there was currently no English parliament, and that the “big society” was only applicable to England. The Tate Gallery’s brand, for example, is an expression of British statecraft which barely registers in Scotland.  Acknowledging the influence of Hedley Bull’s, The Anarchical Society,  Mullholland noted that within the world order there are multiple loyalties and when applied to Scotland this reveals what he describes as ‘ disputed national imaginaries’.

Mulholland went on to discuss ideas of cultural ecology - how long will our share of the world’s wealth be maintained ? - citing Eric Raymond’s, The Cathedral and the Bazaar,  before returning to the local, where artists’ voices and activities can be and should be of real importance. The example of the New 57 Gallery’s constitution, which was in turn adopted by Transmission and the Collective Gallery amongst others, exemplifies a set of values developed locally, but capable of allowing national and international dialogues and exchanges and offers a ready-made course of action for artists.

14 Nov 2010

Art and Technology by Peter Hill in the current Times Higher Education

An interesting read about "Art and Technology" by Peter Hill.


This article is in the current edition of The Times Education Supplement

9 Nov 2010

Art21 Resource

Art in the Twenty-First Century is a PBS documentary series about contemporary visual art in the United States and the artists who make it. It is well worth a visit!

www.pbs.org/art21

24 Oct 2010

Market Gallery Forum: Art and the Economy - Saturday 6th Nov

Market Gallery Forum: Art and the Economy.

The Forum's programme includes presentations by the following keynote speakers:

Francis McKee
Mark Fisher
Mark Robinson
Peter McCaughey
Ellie Harrison

Location: second floor of Barras Bargains, corner of London Road and Bain Street, Glasgow, G40 2ST.

Time: 10:00 - 17:00 on Saturday 6th November, 2010.

With the themes discussed in the Forum in mind, Market have specially programmed an exhibition of work by recent GSA MFA graduate Ellie Harrison - work previously unseen in the UK. Her exhibition comprises two installations including The History of Financial Crises, in which the turbulent history of 20th century capitalism is re-enacted by popcorn machines.


Market are running free buses from the Forum at 1715 to Market for the opening of Ellie Harrison's exhibition. Please join us then for round-table discussion, an artist talk by Ellie Harrison, and refreshments.


Location: Market Gallery, 334 Duke St., Glasgow G31 1QZ.

Time: 19:00 - 21:00 on Saturday 6th November, 2010

Artist's Talk: 19:30

For more information please visit

http://www.marketgallery.org.uk/

Exhibition making as Activism – Whose Politics?

Taking place during the Frieze Art Fair, Frieze Talks was a daily programme of keynote lectures, panel debates and discussions presented by Frieze Foundation and programmed by the editors of frieze magazine.

Exhibition making as Activism – Whose Politics?

12pm, Sunday 17 October

A myriad of approaches are taken by artists, writers and curators whose work responds to complex social issues and political situations. To what extent do the political and personal intersect? Can art be effective activism and vice versa?

* Jeremy Deller (Artist, UK)
* Galit Eilat (Writer, Curator and Founding Director of The Israeli Center for Digital Art, Holon, Israel)
* Emily Roysdon (Artist and Writer, USA)
* Chair: Negar Azimi (Senior Editor, Bidoun magazine)

The talks can be listened to or downloaded from the following website:

http://www.friezefoundation.org/talks/


17 Sept 2010

AHM value the arts!


AHM value the arts! Do you?

Show your support at http://www.ivaluethearts.org.uk

13 Sept 2010

Save the arts

Over a hundred leading artists including David Hockney, Anthony Caro, Damien Hirst, Howard Hodgkin, Anish Kapoor, Richard Hamilton, Antony Gormley and Tracey Emin have joined the campaign to fight against the proposed 25% cuts in government funding of the arts.

The campaign is being launched today Friday 10 September 2010 with the release of a new video animation by artist David Shrigley highlighting the effect of the funding cuts. Each week the work of a different artist, created in response to the campaign, will be released. Jeremy Deller and Mark Wallinger will follow David Shrigley.

To view Shrigley's animation, see below



Please visit the Save the Arts website (including links to Facebook, Vimeo and Twitter) and to sign the online petition,

http://savethearts-uk.blogspot.com/

10 Jun 2010

Creative Scotland roadshow/discussion

Sam attended the fourth and final Creative Scotland roadshow/discussion on Tuesday 25th May at the Briggait, Glasgow.

Here are her responses to the event...

"Arriving to a full on jazz big band, delightful though they were, made it completely impossible to have any kind of (informal) conversation with other delegates, especially those from other artforms whom I (and others?) might not know before the main event....

Next the acoustics of the Briggait's central space made it very difficult to hear the speakers as there was so much echo....

I tried to find fellow visual artists before it began and found Beth Forde and Steve Slater from Tramway (performing arts) which is worth noting in a group of 250 people.. ......I don't know nearly everyone, of course, in the visual arts world, far from it, but I was astonished at how few people I knew from the visual arts world were there, I can only speculate that either; a) they were making a political point by not attending. ie we are against the whole concept of Creative Scotland? or b) we feel there is little point in engaging with a body whose focus (rightly or wrongly, and this is something Andrew Dixon must address) is giving so much precedence to the "Creative Industries" and the arts as instrumental (validated by health and other social benefits) ..........

Good statements I remember from Andrew Dixon, (Head of Creative Scotland) and Fiona Hyslop ( Minister of Culture) were

"the language of investment in artists of the future, rather than subsidy"

CS to be seen as as a "rallying force for culture rather than an institution"

Andrew suggested that Scotland could become one of the top ten most cultured countries in the world, having discovered that Scotland is rated 18th out of 60 countries as a "national brand" (using the Anholt-GfK Roper Nation Brands Index, does that not sound a made up institution or what?!)

Worrying statements are

"The need to set social and economic objectives not just cultural"

"International working of the Government should see Scottish Culture as part of this import/export model....culture as a "calling card" to other countries"

CS has 30% of the Scottish Governments cultural budget and wants to be inclusive but also wants it to be seen as a "brand", every time I hear that term my blood freezes ; echoes of Thatcherism and the horrors that followed; rear their ugly head ("There is no such thing as society")

The three questions on each table at the Briggait meeting for us to contemplate were;

1) Are there new models or ways in which Creative Scotland can invest in the arts, creative industries or screen sectors?
Answers from our table...... Private/Public partnerships, Tax breaks for sponsors and artists

2) How can we get everyone championing Scotland's creative success (in homes, schools, across the regions and artforms)\
Answers from our table ....(lame I thought) get rid of demarcation between specialisms, professionals and amateurs...aaargh

3) How can Scotland maximise the international potential of its cultural production?
Answers from our table (again, we had no idea what other "tables' at this meeting were coming up with in term of ideas)
Confusion about role of British Council compared to CS's international role? A special unit had been suggested at CS which will focus on a small number of areas; reputation, creativity, economic impact and to showcase the best of Scotland's culture .....who is talking to whom?

20 Mar 2010

Ranting Sam

Have just listened to the programme between Shirley Manson and Douglas, its not half as bad as everyone has been telling me!! We are "old school" and in my view do not understand the very close relationship between cont. music and art in defining the experience of generations after us; for me music and art were twin interests but not intertwined in the way (and influencing each other) they have been for succeeding generations (See Sarah Lowndes book!)
In any case, in view of the fact that Douglas was hesitant to name his influences apart from his Mother and Father, cinema, books and television here is another question for our conversation in relation to a statement he made in the film' "I want art to be an alibi for people to think about what's really important to them" (ie it should not be about Douglas, the artist, the bringer of that experience)
so the question is what is really important to him??? either within or outside of his artwork?
ps I think Shirley Manson is great! She is intelligent, widely read, writes good songs, hangs out with writers and is a huge influence on the "yoof" of today, there are so many horrendous role models for young people; she is a good one in my view.
And by the way I totally agree with Douglas about reality tv being the opium of the masses and the worst thing to have happened in the UK in the last 20 years...I know the argument is that it is happening in every country but it origniated here and we should fight its effects on every aspect of our culture (dumbing down doesn't even begin to describe it) Ranting Sam